Historically, HP has not been a big player in the consumer storage market. Recently however, the HP brand has been used for several SSDs based on reference designs for Silicon Motion's SSD controllers.

Last year, the HP S700 and S700 Pro were relatively uninteresting low-end SATA SSDs in a very crowded market. This year, we have a pair of HP SSDs featuring Silicon Motion's second-generation NVMe SSD controllers and the latest Intel/Micron 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. Silicon Motion has made huge improvements to their NVMe controller design and produced a whole family of controllers. The HP EX920 uses the high-end SM2262 controller, while the HP EX900 uses the entry-level SM2263XT.

Our first hands-on experience with the SM2262 controller was at Flash Memory Summit 2017 last August, where Silicon Motion gave us the opportunity to play with early engineering samples. Between the time constraints of benchmarking during a trade show and the firmware bugs that existed at the time, we weren't able to get a good picture of the SM2262's performance, but it was clear that there was at least some truth to the very bold performance claims Silicon Motion was making - claims we viewed with skepticism given how disappointing their SM2260 first-generation NVMe controller was in drives like the Intel 600p.

The first SM2262 drive to come to market was the Intel 760p, which we liked at the time of its release, but we didn't get to test it in high enough capacities to really stress the SM2262 controller. The allure of the 760p was diminished when the price shot up shortly after release, but that made room for drives like the HP EX920.

HP EX920 Specifications
Capacity 256 GB 512 GB 1 TB
Controller Silicon Motion SM2262
NAND Flash Intel/Micron 64L 3D TLC
Form-Factor, Interface double-sided M.2 2280 PCIe 3 x4 NVMe 1.3
Sequential Read 3200 MB/s 3200 MB/s 3200 MB/s
Sequential Write 1200 MB/s 1600 MB/s 1800 MB/s
Random Read 180k IOPS 340k IOPS 350k IOPS
Random Write 250k IOPS 260k IOPS 250k IOPS
Power Consumption Active 4.29 W 5.61 W 6.23 W
Idle 0.73 W 0.73 W 0.73 W
Warranty 5 years
Write Endurance 160 TB 320 TB 650 TB
Price $108.89 (43¢/GB) $175.99 (34¢/GB) $289.99 (28¢/GB)

The HP EX920 is currently the flagship of HP's SSD brand, but it is not entirely positioned like a premium NVMe SSD. The performance specs certainly place it in that market segment, but the pricing puts it below competitors like Samsung's 970 series or the Western Digital WD Black. HP initially released the EX920 with a three year warranty and 0.8 drive writes per day endurance rating (providing the same TBW as a typical five-year/0.5 DWPD SSD), but has since extended the warranty to a full five years and updated the drive's packaging.

Our 1TB HP EX920 sample is a double-sided M.2 card with two NAND packages and one DRAM package on each side. There are some passive power regulation components on the back side, so even the lower capacities that don't need to populate the back with memory still need a few millimeters of clearance that not all laptops offer. The controller chip bears HP's logo, but underneath is the standard SM2262 controller. Silicon Motion is using the same plated copper heatspreader that the SM2260 controller featured, and the EX920 doesn't add any other form of heatsink or heatspreader.

The SM2262 controller uses a dual-core ARM CPU, but that's actually one of the least important parts of the controller design. Silicon Motion has put a lot of effort into improving their LDPC error correction engine to support higher data rates. The SM2260 already used an 8-channel NAND interface and a PCIe 3 x4 host interface, but it couldn't come close to saturating the PCIe link, especially when paired with the relatively slow first-generation Intel/Micron 3D TLC NAND.

The Competition

There are now several SM2262-based SSDs on the market. In addition to the Intel 760p, the HP EX920 also faces competition from the ADATA XPG SX8200 and the related XPG GAMMIX S11 (the SX8200, but with a heatsink). Several of the usual suspects also now have high-end NVMe drives with 3D TLC NAND: Samsung's 970 EVO, Western Digital's WD Black and SanDisk Extreme Pro, Plextor's M9Pe family.

High-end options are a little slim at the moment from brands that usually combine Toshiba NAND and Phison controllers: the low-end Phison E8 controller has been shipping for months, but the high-end Phison E12 controller is still in the sampling phase. Like Silicon Motion, Phison's first-generation E7 NVMe controller wasn't really able to compete in the high end when it was new, and without 3D NAND support the Phison E7 is completely obsolete. Toshiba's own XG5 OEM SSD also still hasn't seen a retail release to replace the Toshiba OCZ RD400, and at this point it looks like their next retail NVMe SSD will probably be based on the successor to the XG5.

AnandTech 2018 Consumer SSD Testbed
CPU Intel Xeon E3 1240 v5
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty E3V5 Performance Gaming/OC
Chipset Intel C232
Memory 4x 8GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 CL15
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 5450, 1920x1200@60Hz
Software Windows 10 x64, version 1709
Linux kernel version 4.14, fio version 3.6
Spectre/Meltdown microcode and OS patches current as of May 2018
AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • DigitalFreak - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    Too bad NVMe drives still have a price premium over SATA, but at least we're starting to get good performing drives without the ridiculous Samsung markup.
  • bubblyboo - Tuesday, July 10, 2018 - link

    I mean I just got a 512GB 970 Pro for <$200 but sure Samsung has a "ridiculous markup".
  • grahad - Tuesday, July 10, 2018 - link

    Sales don't really count. It's 229.99 on Amazon and Newegg at the moment.
  • bubblyboo - Tuesday, July 10, 2018 - link

    That's still not much since it's just about the only consumer 3D MLC NVME drive.
  • Hectandan - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link

    There are still few SSDs besides Samsung with consistent performance under heavy workload, and I don't know why one needs NVMe at all if not for some kind of workload.
  • shabby - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    Can you guys start separating tests based on ssd sizes? Seeing a 1tb ssd benched against one half its size or even a quarter somewhat isn't fair.
  • Billy Tallis - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    The drives in this review that aren't 1TB are either representing controller+NAND combinations that I don't have a 1TB drive for, or are there to show how the same controller+NAND combination as the drive being reviewed scales with capacity.
  • milkod2001 - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    Would be nice if prices came down so this would be more popular and they would sell more. I mean 1TB m2 SSD under $100 would be nice. I doesn't cost them more than 20 bucks to make one anyway.
  • mkaibear - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    What's your source on that bill of materials? It sounds distinctly fishy to me
  • RickyBaby - Monday, July 9, 2018 - link

    Bought this drive off an Ebay store for $230 - on sale + 15% coupon and got it Friday. Installed in an Asrock Z97 mobo with an adapter card - thanks to Asrock for adding the pcie boot option to the bios awhile back. Did a fresh install of Win10 ... didn't want to disk clone and bring forward all the crap. Haven't done much with it yet ... it does boot very fast ! Ran a few benchies. Crystal Diskmark shows a 2,900 read and 1,700 write score for the Q32TI Seq speed ... not bad for an aging system !

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now